Comment # 6
on bug 8584
from J. Bruce Fields
(In reply to comment #4)
> Evan, I appreciate your concern. Eventually per our earlier agreement,
> routines like "dissect_nfs_open4_share_access" will be renamed
> "dissect_nfs4_open_share_access" so I don't see any conflict with this patch
> or others like it that simply flesh out some of the new capabilities of
> NFSv4.1. Rest assurred that my patches will be built on the latest version
> of this dissector so this should keep conflicts to a minimum.
>
> Bruce, feel free to contact me if you want to submit more patches before
> 8581 is ready to go and think there might be a conflict with what I'm
> working on. My changes have more to do with renaming, reorganzing some of
> the code, and eliminating needless subtree levels.
Sounds like a good idea.
Doesn't sound like anything that'll need careful coordination. Evan, feel free
to just ignore any patch of mine that doesn't apply cleanly and leave it to me
to rework the patch and resubmit.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.