Comment # 4
on bug 8584
from Cal Turney
(In reply to comment #3)
> Thanks for the last couple of patches - if you're going to be posting any
> more could you please coordinate a bit with Cal Turney (who posted bug
> #8581). It's great to have people working on the NFS dissector but I'm
> suddenly afraid I'm going to have to start hand-resolving patch conflicts
> (as problems go that's a good one to have at least).
I've CCed Cal on this
> ticket and added "See Also" for the other NFS-related patches in the last
> few days.
Cheers,
Evan
Evan, I appreciate your concern. Eventually per our earlier agreement, routines
like "dissect_nfs_open4_share_access" will be renamed
"dissect_nfs4_open_share_access" so I don't see any conflict with this patch or
others like it that simply flesh out some of the new capabilities of NFSv4.1.
Rest assurred that my patches will be built on the latest version of this
dissector so this should keep conflicts to a minimum.
Bruce, feel free to contact me if you want to submit more patches before 8581
is ready to go and think there might be a conflict with what I'm working on. My
changes have more to do with renaming, reorganzing some of the code, and
eliminating needless subtree levels.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.