Comment # 14
on bug 8225
from Tyson Key
Agreed regarding the TCP port registration.
I've got some unsubmitted, local modifications containing an attempt at
dissecting "Ping" packets, and some more trace files that I could share -
although I'd probably have to tidy up the source file, since it's full of messy
C-style comments containing snippets from server logs + raw packet dumps that
I've been trying to reconcile.
Still, said notes might be vaguely useful for future references.
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > Thanks, Evan.
> >
> > It looks like I'd have to do some reverse-engineering of packets, whilst
> > looking at server logs, if I'm going to try and take this any further, to be
> > honest - since documentation regarding this protocol family is scarce; and
> > the limited information is seemingly inaccurate/self-contradictory in places.
>
> That's unfortunate. When you've taken it as far as you want to then turn it
> into a patch with Makefile changes as usual and I'll take a look. Even just
> recognizing them is a big step up from displaying unknown "Data" :)
>
> Evan
>
> P.S. I'm slightly wary of the dissector registering by default on a TCP port
> that isn't IANA-registered. This should perhaps be a preference?
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.