Comment # 17
on bug 8240
from Manuel Hofer
(In reply to comment #16)
> Committed with a number of changes in SVN #47247.
>
> Thanks !
>
> Please review the changes. If I've broken anything or made something worse,
> please let me know.
>
after a quick review and test i found the tls auth & tls auth detection
override preferences not working as intended - i most definitly missed
something around that part again...
>
> Primary changes:
> Rework & simplify the reassembly related code;
> Revise the display of "message fragments" on the packet details
> tree: Essentially: show as "data" only "message fragments" which are
> part of a multi-fragment message.
> Show the SSL dissection (of a reassembled message) at the outer level of
> the
> packet details tree (not under the OpenVPN/data branch of the tree).
>
> Note: handling "multiple fragments in a frame" has always been difficult; The
> solution you implemented for handling reassembly and display on the
> packet details tree of multiple fragments in a frame works nicly.
> Trying to show information for multiple fragments in a frame on the
> "packet summary line" is difficult so I didn't even try to
> do something with that.
>
> Bugs fixed:
> - Repeated changes of the port prefs would not work properly;
> Ports prefs code changed to work in the usual manner.
> - Opcode lookup in value_string for COL_INFO "off by 1"
> - "Data (-1 bytes)"
> - Filter names for hf entries related to reassembly need to begin with
> "openvpn".
>
>
> (Note: it seems that at least some of the revised patches submitted were not
> compiled and tested. It would be appreciated if patches are tested before
> submission).
i must have compiled and tested the wrong code then - i am sorry for that.
i will do a more thorough review and testing in a week or so!
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.