Bill Meier
changed
bug 8173
What |
Removed |
Added |
Status |
UNCONFIRMED
|
RESOLVED
|
Resolution |
---
|
NOTABUG
|
Comment # 7
on bug 8173
from Bill Meier
(In reply to comment #6)
>
> Sorry for the confusion.
Not a problem... We're always glad to help.
> There *might* be a bug about handling a new connection on the same port but
> that's a separate bug (and not what you're reporting as a bug in this report).
After looking at the tcp dissector code, it turns out that the code explicitly
treats a SYN with the same sequence number as a previous SYN as a
retransmission (and as part of the same "connection").
(Given the issues and rules about TCP "sequence number reuse" I believe this is
correct).
The comment in the tcp dissector source:
/* If this is a SYN packet, then check if it's seq-nr is different
* from the base_seq of the retrieved conversation. If this is the
* case, create a new conversation with the same addresses and ports
* and set the TA_PORTS_REUSED flag. If the seq-nr is the same as
* the base_seq, then do nothing so it will be marked as a retrans-
* mission later.
(Note: I would claim that a tcp stack which uses the same initial sequence
number for all connections is broken).
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.