https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8015
--- Comment #1 from Andy Karch <akk142@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-11-23 12:43:24 PST ---
I have a few points to verify with the diff (and understand the rationale):
- Should the hf_register_info->header_field_info->type 'ftenum' be
FT_STRING
or FT_STRINGZ? What is the difference? It says to use FT_STRINGZ with
proto_tree_add_item(), but why is it different?
- Is ENC_ASCII the right argument for proto_tree_add_item? RFC2661 says the
AVP contents is ASCII. Seems obvious, but I just want to be sure.
- It appears that the ASCII payload could have length '0' (avp length 6),
where there is no space for the NULL terminating character. In this case,
'avp_len' would be '0' due to subtractions for the AVP header. Would the
'0' length sufficiently protect against overrunning the AVP payload? I
assume the 'length' argument to proto_tree_add_item() has the protection
for missing NULL termination, but I want to be sure.
Thanks,
-Andy
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.