https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7728
--- Comment #17 from Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-10-24 15:21:12 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> I was actually a bit
> surprised to see my naive solution being merged so fast :)
It fixed the bug and I didn't take the time to think through the implications
particularly well :/
(In reply to comment #11)
> Does the subtype serve *any* purpose other than making "Apply as Filter" work?
>
> If not, would replacing SET_ADDRESS_SUB() with a macro that takes an hf_ value
> as an argument, specifying that the field in question corresponds to the
> address in question, be an alternative?
I think this is probably the simplest/best solution for the actual bug. The
additional filter options should be split into a separate enhancement ticket.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.