https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1543
--- Comment #4 from Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-09-28 00:06:28 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hi Anders,
>
> from my understanding of the 3GPP 23.003 chapter 9.1 spec, the previous code
> was perfectly valid and the change you did in revision 21471 is not valid:
> "The APN consists of one or more labels. Each label is coded as a one octet
> length field followed by that number of octets coded as 8 bit ASCII characters.
> Following RFC 1035 [19] the labels shall consist only of the alphabetic
> characters (A-Z and a-z), digits (0-9) and the hyphen (-). Following RFC 1123
> [20], the label shall begin and end with either an alphabetic character or a
> digit. The case of alphabetic characters is not significant. The APN is not
> terminated by a length byte of zero."
> For me the APN provided in the sample of this bug was not coded properly.
> Do you agree with me?
Yes, I think you are right.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.