https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7711
--- Comment #12 from Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-09-11 04:27:51 PDT ---
> So, some questions for this feature:
> - Is 'Detect' the appropriate word in this context?
Auto detect ?
> - Would it be useful or counter-intuitive to show the detected settings
> somewhere in the proto tree for dissected L2TPv3 data packets?
I think it would be useful. We use the convetion of [generated field]
e.g sqare brackets surronding generated fields(text). A link to the frame
containing the base for deciding might be useul too.
> - By overriding a detected value in the context menu, it overrides the setting
> on a protocol-wide, rather than a conversation basis. Can anyone think of a way
> from the UI to override the setting per-conversation?
I think this topic is worth a discussion on the developers mailing list.
It would be quite useful to be able to fill in or change conversation data
trough the GUI. It should probably be made trough protocol-preferenses or a
separate conversation menu possibly with an UAT like thingy per conversation
data type. having a conversation reference in the tree and beeing able to right
click it to bring up the menu would be nice too.
Regards
Anders
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.