https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7639
--- Comment #58 from Michael Mann <mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-09-10 05:26:51 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #49)
> > I think the pref_decode_by preference structure would be much better suited as
> > a UAT. You could also verify the dissector string names within the UAT in case
> > the user makes a typo.
> Ok, I will try, but I do not think that this will be much better then my
> solution.
> With your solution there is possibility to verify the dissector string name,
> but with my solution access to fields is faster.
The access may be faster, but is probably negligable unless the list is huge.
My concern was to not have users create a CSV string (which the UAT was
designed to prevent), which I think is a bigger hassle than field access when
the list is huge.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.