https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7348
--- Comment #8 from Chris Maynard <christopher.maynard@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-08-29 12:01:43 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Created attachment 9006 [details]
> Sort dissectors patch v2
Sorting looks good!
In dissector_compare_filter_name(), why not just use "" instead of "(none)"?
Any possibility of removing the duplicates mentioned in comment 5?
> Hopefully this takes care of all of the sorting issues. It's not fast with the
> sorting of the hash table keys and then using the keys to look back into the
> hash table, but the function shouldn't be used that much that speed should
> really be an issue.
In my simple tests, it did not appear any slower, so I don't think there should
be any concern about performance here.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.