https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6973
--- Comment #41 from Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-07-06 10:49:46 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > (In reply to comment #25)
> > > (In reply to comment #21)
> > > > (In reply to comment #19)
> > > > > * Drop libnl1 support. Any distro new enough to compile WS will have at least
> > > > > libnl2.
> > > >
> > > > FWIW my normal development system (Fedora 10) has libnl-1.1-5.
> > >
> > > OK, do we plan to commit this patch or add support to libnl-1.x ?
> > >
> > > Currently building wireshark with libnl-1 (dev-libs/libnl-1.1-r2) fails with:
> >
> > It's fine with me if 1.x is not supported as long as it compiles when we have
> > 1.x installed (in which case I'd expect that we don't define HAVE_LIBNL).
>
> I assumed that libnl 1 died with the dinosaurs but you have proved me wrong :)
> I added a patch to support V1. It's really trivial so there is little reason
> not to support it.
I recently installed the libnl-devel package but now my Wireshark builds fail
at:
~~~
../../../ws80211_utils.h:34: error: 'NL80211_CHAN_NO_HT' undeclared here (not
in a function)
../../../ws80211_utils.h:35: error: 'NL80211_CHAN_HT20' undeclared here (not in
a function)
../../../ws80211_utils.h:36: error: 'NL80211_CHAN_HT40MINUS' undeclared here
(not in a function)
../../../ws80211_utils.h:37: error: 'NL80211_CHAN_HT40PLUS' undeclared here
(not in a function)
~~~
The exact RPM I have is libnl-devel-1.1-5.fc10.x86_64 . I don't have at the
time to figure out when those symbols showed up and/or what to do about it;
maybe a configure-compile-test is needed?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.