https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7407
Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx
--- Comment #3 from Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-07-05 13:26:46 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created attachment 8721 [details]
> Updated ESTA manufacturer IDs + OEM code values
>
> Updated the value_strings (and updated them to ext_value_strings).
>
> "endianness" of ESTA code has already been accounted for, but was kept as
> 16-bit value.
Following the update to ext_value_string, you lack the OR with BASE_EXT_STRING
in the hf fields.
It seems that some OEM codes (that were previously defined in packet-artnet.c)
do not match the current spec given in attachment 8684. Should they be updated
also? (if you feel courageous enough of course :))
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.