https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7314
--- Comment #7 from Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-06-07 18:51:00 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I was going to pretend that someone with may want to read SONET/SDH from a pcap file,
> so when I started implementing the dissector I didn't want to utilise anything ERF specific.
Presumably "from a pcap file" you meant "from a pcap file using a LINKTYPE_
value other than LINKTYPE_ERF or from a pcap-ng file where the interface(s)
carrying SONET/SDH traffic have a LINKTYPE_ value other than LINKTYPE_ERF", as
LINKTYPE_ERF encapsulates ERF records, complete with the extension headers.
> I'm doubtful as to ever finding a pcap file with SONET traffic though
Given that no LINKTYPE_ value has been assigned for raw SONET/SDH, you're
unlikely ever to see such a file until such a LINKTYPE_ value has been
introduced, and, if somebody proposes a LINKTYPE_ value for raw SONET/SDH on
tcpdump-workers, if the suggestion doesn't include a pseudo-header to give
information of the sort that appears in the Extension Header 5, I'll make that
suggestion myself.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.