https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7256
--- Comment #3 from Frank Lahm <franklahm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-15 08:12:31 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Hi,
>
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Created attachment 8433 [details]
> > Patch
>
> This patch reverts part of r39210 which was fixing bug #6378
>
> i.e.
>
> - proto_tree_add_text(tree, tvb, offset, query_length, "%u %s",
> subquery_count, plurality(subquery_count, "null", "nulls"));
> - count -= subquery_count;
>
> Do we really need these xxxxx null fields? or it can be just one?
I'd prefer to have them printed explicitly instead of collated. I was also
planning to similarily expand the other basic types (int, float).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.