https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5284
--- Comment #21 from Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-25 14:46:47 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> The original option (per-edt memory pools) works correctly in all the cases
> I've been able to come up with.
Will it realy?
> ep_dissect_new(edt1)
> ...
> ep_dissect_new(edt2)
Stuff with edt1 allocating ep_mamory from pool2?
> ...
> ep_dissect_cleanup(edt2)
pool 2 cleared
> ...
> ep_dissect_new(edt3)
all ep allocs from pool3
> ...
> ep_dissect_cleanup(edt3)
> ...
> ep_dissect_cleanup(edt1)
>
Or am I missing something? the refcounting solution might bloat the memory
usage somewhat but it seems safe(er). on the plus side is also that it sholdn't
give any performance hit.
Regards
Anders
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.