https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7154
--- Comment #7 from Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-23 01:30:36 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Hi,
> >
> > It is not possible to use proto_tree_add_item ? (it is not recommended to use
> > proto_tree_add_text...)
>
> Thanks for the feedback. As a wireshark newbie, I wasn't aware of the
> preference for proto_tree_add_item. In packet-isis-*.c, proto_tree_add_text
> appears to be called far more often than proto_tree_add_item, so I just
> followed the convention that seemed to be preferred based on what I saw in
> those files.
Yes, it is better to use the some convention but use proto_tree_add_item is
better ! (Make field filterable...)
It is possible to update your patch ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.