https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6883
--- Comment #16 from Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-03-06 14:04:29 PST ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Jeff and Anders,
>
> Thanks for your help on this one. Am I supposed to close this bug or should
> the reviewer do so?
Normally the one checking in the files does it; I did it in my last action, so
nothing more needs to be done.
(Okay, it's true there is also a Closed state, but we typically just use
Resolved.)
> With the current default parameters, the VS cl compiler appears to be far more
> lenient for x86 than x86_amd64 builds; and the Linux compiler is far stricter
> than VS cl. I tried changing cl's /W3 option to /W4 but this caused so many
> warnings in other routines that it quit before it ever reached tap-iostat.c.
> I'm open to any suggestions you might have for fully vetting future patches
> before they are submitted. Thanks.
Get a VM with Linux on it? ;-)
I don't have any other suggestions.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.