https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3884
--- Comment #10 from Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-01-28 08:01:17 PST ---
Hi,
Would this patch be acceptable if it checked for the maximum
length for the int types, as it would be ok to store a one byte value in a
FT_UINT16 say.(Not sure about FT_BOOLEAN).
Any way we could apply the asserts where the length is defined (FT_IPv4,...).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.