https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6155
--- Comment #17 from Chris Maynard <christopher.maynard@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-11-15 13:56:47 PST ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> I do note that the usb-at dissector uses "USB/AT" (I think) for COL_PROTOCOL,
> and "at..." as the filter names. It seems to me that it would be more
> consistent to also change this dissector to use "USBAT" & "usbat..." instead.
I implemented it that way in a proposed patch submitted in bug 5868. I thought
maybe one day we could have other dissectors where we'd see AT traffic besides
USB/AT, such as RS232/AT, for example. But if you think it's better to change
it to USBAT, then I don't have a problem with that. There's nothing really
"USB" about it though; in fact, we might just change it from packet-usb-at.c to
packet-at.c.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.