Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5730] Dissector for HSR and PRP-1
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5730 --- Comment #5 from Stephen Fisher <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-20 13:24:51 MDT --- Thanks for the updated patch! Here are my comments, which are mostly for visual reasons to be consistent with Wireshark but some are also functional changes: - Remove unnecessary include files stdio.h, stdlib.h, string.h and epan/prefs.h from removed from epan/dissectors/packet-hsr-prp-supervision.c and packet-hsr.c - Move the closing }; to its own line in the type_vals and hsr_laneid_vals and prp_type_vals value string definitions - Remove preferences code in proto_reg_handoff_hsr_prp_supervision() and proto_reg_handoff_hsr() since the dissectors don't have preferences - The proto_set_decoding can be removed along with hsr_enable_dissector since it isn't doing anything except always enabling the dissector, which is Wireshark's default. - Remove unnecessary forward declaration of proto_reg_handoff_hsr_prp_supervision() and proto_reg_handoff_hsr (Wireshark will automatically generate the needed forward declarations to call these functions when building and place them in epan/dissectors/register.c - Change deprecated function name in packet-hsr.c: dissector_try_port -> dissector_try_uint (takes same parameters)... this was found with the tools/checkAPIs.pl script - Added yourself to the AUTHORS file - Remove the if(!tree) return and instead include most of the dissect_hsr_prp_supervision() function in an if(tree) block. I left the COL_PROTOCOL and COL_INFO statements before this. It isn't strictly necessary to put the if(tree) at all though, because functions such as proto_tree_add_item() will return if !tree and this would allow your code to set the columns more accurately further down in the code. It's really only important to use if(tree) if you have complex code that will waste CPU cycles or memory calculating things for the tree output when Wireshark doesn't even need it. - Remove the if(!tree) return from packet-hsr.c per last comment - The while(1) in packet-hsr-prp-supervision.c for "ensure we can read 2 bytes without exception" is unusual and should probably be avoided. The proto_tree_add_item, tvb_get_ and related functions will throw an exception if it runs out of bytes in the packet, which is the proper behavior (because it will be marked by Wireshark as malformed). - Can sup_version be defined as a "guint16" (16-bit) instead of an "int" (32 or 64-bit) since you're assigning it with tvb_get_ntohs() (network to host short/16-bit)? - Can tlv_type and tlv_length be changed to guint8 (8 bit) instead of guint16 since you're fetching them with tvb_get_guint8? - We don't typically put a list of revisions at the top of source files since the revisions are kept in the version control (SVN) history -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.
- Prev by Date: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 6474] CAPv2 decoding: initialDPArgExtension is not well decoded
- Next by Date: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5730] Dissector for HSR and PRP-1
- Previous by thread: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5730] Dissector for HSR and PRP-1
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5730] Dissector for HSR and PRP-1
- Index(es):