https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6422
--- Comment #7 from Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-08 11:00:48 PDT ---
(From update of attachment 7133)
Why create a new function and not use proto_tree_add_bitmask ?
So I'm not sure this patch is necessary ! it is not a problem for me to have
similar bitfield construction...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.