https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #3 from Martin Kaiser <wireshark@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-05-19 10:01:21 PDT ---
ping?
is my explanation sufficient or do you want me to submit a patch that does not
remove the pmt version filter?
Thanks for your response, I'd like to get this done. It's really a small change
and I have many other pending (unsubmitted) changes.
Martin
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
>
> > I'm not familiar with this protocol, but what makes that filter pointless? Is
> > it because it was displaying the whole byte as if it were one value when it's
> > really two values when using masks like your patch? Any reason to not use
> > proto_tree_add_item() with masks for the separate value?
>
> as you say, it's two values combined in one field. Even if they were separated,
> the ca_pmt version number is just an arbitrary value defined by a broadcaster's
> playout equipment. It doesn't make any sense to filter for specific values. To
> filter all updates of a ca_pmt message, dvbci.ca_pmt_list_management can be
> used.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.