https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5753
Roland Knall <rknall@xxxxxxxxx> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #6014|0 |1
is obsolete| |
Attachment #6039| |review_for_checkin?
Flag| |
--- Comment #8 from Roland Knall <rknall@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-03-20 12:43:38 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=6039)
--> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6039)
A new version of the patch, correcting the issues, mentioned in the bug report.
I fixed the following issues:
(From Guy Harris)
- identation is now 4 spaces
- if the type cannot be determined, the dissector returns FALSE. If there
would be another type, the underlying network would fail per definition
- SercosIII dissector now correctly uses subdissector, and the comment has
been corrected
- private data uses ep_alloc now
(From Jakub Zawadzki)
- cleanup with ep_strdup and ep_alloc0
- removed unnecessary _U_ and cleaned up function prototypes
- fuzz testing this dissector is not necessary. The standard for openSAFETY is
pretty strict what you can send (even down to the small bytes in the payload).
But I have stress-tested my plugin in an environment where up to 100 so called
Safety Nodes where communicating, and it holds up. Additionally the plugin will
be tested in similar environment on a daily basis in our company's daily
business.
Thank you both, for your help so far, btw.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.