https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5651
--- Comment #6 from Cal Turney <turney_cal@xxxxxxx> 2011-02-11 06:47:44 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Is there any reason why the analysis should not take place before the options
> > are dissected? If not, that would be the easiest way to go.
>
> Sounds good, although I'm not 100% sure that the analysis does not take the IP
> options into account...
>
>
> > If not, I'll get started.
>
> Feel free to go ahead, as I don't think I will have time for it myself... Thx!
Sake, moving the analysis above the options works fine but as I worked on this,
I realized a great opportunity exists for improving the overall layout of TCP
tree. I would like to have my group review these changes before submitting
them under another bug number. When I do so, I'll reference this one and set
the status appropriately or if you'd prefer to change the status now, that's
fine. Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.