https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5538
--- Comment #3 from Sake <sake@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-09 02:24:33 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This will require extra code in the core of Wireshark to handle the prefix
> length/mask handling like we do for field type IPv4 now (epan/ipv4.[ch] and
> epan/ftypes/ftype-ipv4.[ch]). The issue is that we currently treat the IPv6
> field type as a FT_BYTES with a few minor differences. I'm working on breaking
> it out into its own type like IPv4.
Great... I came to the same conclusion, but was not able to find time to take
on such a large task now. If you have any intermediate diffs we might be able
to work on it together...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.