https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1163
--- Comment #16 from Chris Maynard <christopher.maynard@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-03 13:34:54 PDT ---
OK, I was trying to take a look at this one and while I'm not sure I'll be able
make any further progress than Steve did with his heuristics, right now I'm
confused with something. The second paragraph of
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc905#section-13.2 reads as follows:
When consecutive octets are used to represent a binary number,
the lower octet number has the least significant value.
Doesn't this mean this protocol uses little-endian byte ordering? If so, why
does packet-ositp.c treat all multi-byte fields as big-endian? What am I
missing? Am I interpreting it incorrectly?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.