https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5279
--- Comment #5 from Sake <sake@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-10-06 11:02:58 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> And of course you also need "Mark All Packets" and "Unmark All Packets", but we
> might also need "Mark All Displayed Packets" and "Unmark All Displayed Packets.
Currently mark/unmark all packets actually means mark/unmark all displayed
packets. I think we best keep it that way.
I'm not sure we should add options to mark/unmark *ALL* packets...
> > Hmm, I guess we might also need "Invert All Marked/Unmarked Packets" in
> addition to "Invert All Displayed Marked/Unmarked Packets".
I would vote for just adding "Invert Marking of Displayed Packets"
With all of the above one can do all marking/unmarking and inverting of marks
of *ALL* packets by just removing the display filter.
But that's my vote, others might vote for adding 4 more marking options instead
of 1.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.