https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5115
Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Platform|Other |All
OS/Version|Windows XP |All
--- Comment #2 from Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-16 16:50:59 PDT ---
> One would never want to mark or ignore all packets in the capture even if
> the capture is merged with another because those attributes are erased
> when merged.
If those attributes are erased when merged, why would you ever want to mark or
ignore *any* packets? What's so special about marking or ignoring all of them?
What if somebody wants, for whatever reason, to mark all but a few packets?
The easiest way to do that would be to mark all packets and then selectively
unmark packets.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.