Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5106] Add emem_tree_lookup32_array_le_last() or equivalent

Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5106

--- Comment #3 from Chris Maynard <christopher.maynard@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-16 08:06:17 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Maybe not optimal, but I guess you could use the frame number in
> conversation_new()/find_conversation() for your purposes. That is, use
> conversation tracking not just per address pair, but per request as well.

Jaap, could you give me an example of what you mean by this?  If I can find an
alternative method using the existing API that works as well as my current
solution, I can switch to it, but I'm not quite sure I understand exactly what
it is you're suggesting.  Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.