https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4831
--- Comment #4 from Cal Turney <turney_cal@xxxxxxx> 2010-06-03 06:57:35 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Since this data is already in the tree:
>
> Opcode: WRITE (38)
> stateid
> seqid: 0x00000000
> Data: 0f05a64a0100cf0e0000af01
> offset: 32846
> stable: UNSTABLE4 (0)
> write_PDU_length: 47 <<< the new field
> Data: <DATA>
> length: 47 <<<< the existing one
> contents: <DATA>
> fill bytes: opaque data
>
> I suppose the real purpose here is to have a filterable field (the existing
> field is just a text item) and making the existing field filterable would be
> challenging since it's added by the RPC dissector.
That is exactly right. My purpose was to provide a filterable field. Since
the Data->length is not filterable and making it so would not be very
straight-forward, I decided to add a new field to the Read reply and Write
request tree. Sound good?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.