https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2748
--- Comment #6 from Gerasimos Dimitriadis <dimeg@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-26 14:10:31 PDT ---
Yes, I understand that few people would know that these entries existed if they
were hidden... My comment was based on the current handling in the mtp3
dissector, where the mtp3.pc fields are hidden.
Regarding the 3 times printed fields, I was referring to the pointcodes (e.g.
m3ua.protocol_data_opc, mtp3.opc, mtp3.pc)
Thanks,
Gerasimos
(In reply to comment #5)
> Well, hiding entries is considered bad UI (else how does the user know they're
> there?).
>
> Also if they were hidden they'd disappear from, say, the PDML output and I know
> of at least one group using these equivalents from that output.
>
> (BTW they should only appear twice, not three times...? And the equivalents
> are all "hidden" in a subtree, at least for users of the GUI.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.