https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4668
--- Comment #4 from Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-14 09:48:40 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > > This has been testing on Windows XP, both 32-bit and 64-bit.
> >
> > Does this mean fuzztested?
>
> To some degree ... yes. I have a separate piece of test code which generates
> these network packets and have run a variety of data variations against this
> new set of Wireshark software. The previous (current?) version of Wireshark
> identified the Electromagnetic Emission PDU as being received but there was
> nothing there to decode the contents -- that's what I added. Decoding was a
> little tricky since the standard allows multiple variable-length records for
> this PDU type, so quite a bit of testing was done.
What I meant was taking your capture files and running them through
tools/fuzz-test.sh as found in the Wireshark tree. See
http://wiki.wireshark.org/FuzzTesting
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.