https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4343
--- Comment #3 from Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-12-22 13:15:22 CET ---
If you look at RFC 3986 carefully you'll see that the current implementation is
correct:
absolute-URI = scheme ":" hier-part [ "?" query ]
hier-part = "//" authority path-abempty
authority = [ userinfo "@" ] host [ ":" port ]
host = IP-literal / IPv4address / reg-name
IP-literal = "[" ( IPv6address / IPvFuture ) "]"
Apart from the missing "//" in the URI (see
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg26760.html) the Request-URI
Host Part should be as it is.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.