https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3764
--- Comment #16 from Stephen Fisher <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-24 20:11:07 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Clearly, there's room for optimization/improvement here, but I didn't think it
> was worth optimizing since this code doesn't lie in the critical path.
Hopefully it will be someday. I've tried to optimize as I add code for the new
packet list instead of leaving it for later. Leaving it for later means we
might forget to optimize it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.