https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3548
--- Comment #3 from Kovarththanan Rajaratnam <krj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-18 13:54:58 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (From update of attachment 3140 [details])
> This patch is not correct for FT_BOOLEAN, because we use display field for
> number of field bits.
>
> So this changes has to go away:
> - FT_BOOLEAN, 8, NULL, 0,
> + FT_BOOLEAN, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0x0,
>
So my assumption (5) is wrong? I thought the display field was only valid in
case bitmask was non-zero?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.