Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2901] New: DNS dissector conflates KEY, DNSKEY records

Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2901

           Summary: DNS dissector conflates KEY, DNSKEY records
           Product: Wireshark
           Version: SVN
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: Low
         Component: Wireshark
        AssignedTo: wireshark-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        ReportedBy: derekmorr@xxxxxxx



Derek Morr <derekmorr@xxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Attachment #2263|                            |review_for_checkin?
               Flag|                            |


Created an attachment (id=2263)
 --> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2263)
add support for RFC 5011 to DNS dissector

Build Information:
$ ./wireshark -v
wireshark 1.1.0

Copyright 1998-2008 Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> and contributors.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled with GTK+ 2.12.11, with GLib 2.16.5, with libpcap 0.9.8, with libz
1.2.3, with POSIX capabilities (Linux), without libpcre, without SMI, without
c-ares, without ADNS, without Lua, with GnuTLS 2.0.4, with Gcrypt 1.4.0, with
MIT Kerberos, without PortAudio, without AirPcap.
NOTE: this build doesn't support the "matches" operator for Wireshark filter
syntax.

Running on Linux 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.x86_64, with libpcap version 0.9.8.

Built using gcc 4.3.0 20080428 (Red Hat 4.3.0-8).
--
The DNS dissector conflates KEY (used for TSIG) and DNSKEY records. Also, the
DNSKEY dissector doesn't parse the REVOKED flag, defined in RFC 5011.

The attached patch splits KEY and DNSKEY parsing, and adds support for REVOKED.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.