http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2453
--- Comment #27 from Balint Reczey <balint.reczey@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-05-16 04:43:19 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> (In reply to comment #25)
> > > I think you found the problem:
> > >
> > > As you said We are NULLifying already removed objects for which if there was a
> > > __gc it would have being called.
> > I think that NULLifying the stored C pointers does not work, since the Lua code
> > may store pointers to the freed tvb in Lua objects.
> > We can't use _gc, either, because those Lua object may be accessed before any
> > gc run.
> > I think it'd be better to use __assign to prohibit Lua assignment for the
> > problematic objects.
>
> Is there any "__assign" in Lua? I only found a thread on a mailing list (
> http://lua-users.lua.org/lists/lua-l/2004-06/msg00294.html ) which speaks about
> that two tables should be used and "__newindex for assignments and __index for
> reads."
>
> In the Lua 5.1.3 source code ( http://www.lua.org/ftp/lua-5.1.3.tar.gz ) there
> are only the following events (src/ltm.c):
> * __index
> * __newindex
> * __gc
> * __mode
> * __eq
> * __add
> * __sub
> * __mul
> * __div
> * __mod
> * __pow
> * __unm
> * __len
> * __lt
> * __le
> * __concat
> * __call
>
> See also: http://www.lua.org/manual/5.1/manual.html#2.8
>
Hi,
I was not careful enough, i found that thread and thought that overloading
assignment became reality:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.lua.general/40927
:-(
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.