http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2417
--- Comment #3 from Roberto Morro <roberto.morro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-04-08 10:19:11 GMT ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Build Information:
> Paste the COMPLETE build information from "Help->About Wireshark", "wireshark
> -v", or "tshark -v".
> --
> New display filters added to LOCAL_NODE_ID and REMOTE_NOTE_ID SubTLVs (MPLS_TE
> opaque LSA)
(In reply to comment #2)
> Hi, shoudln't
> { "Local Node ID", "ospf.mpls.local_node_id", FT_IPv4,
> really be
> { "Local Node ID", "ospf.oif.local_node_id", FT_IPv4,
> ?
> And the same for the remote node?
Hello Jaap,
since it was an extension of the MPLS-TE LSA, I put it as .mpls. but I agree
with you the .oif. could be more appropriate.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.