http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2263
Hans-Peter Bock <xbk@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #1576|review_for_checkin? |
Flag| |
Attachment #1576 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
Attachment #1592| |review_for_checkin?
Flag| |
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Bock <xbk@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-03-26 16:06:07 GMT ---
Created an attachment (id=1592)
--> (http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1592)
patch that passed the fuzztest
This patch fixes two issues, that showed up during the first fuzztest with the
previous patches. With this patch, the plugin flawlessly passed the first
fuzztest as well as another run on these large capture files:
$ ls -lh /tmp/s*pcap
-rw------- 1 xbk users 206M 26. Mar 15:09 /tmp/s3.pcap
-rw------- 1 xbk users 99M 26. Mar 15:09 /tmp/sercos.pcap
$ ./tools/fuzz-test.sh -p 1 /tmp/*pcap
Running ./tshark with args: -nVxr (1 passes)
Starting pass 1:
/tmp/s3.pcap: OK
/tmp/sercos.pcap: OK
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.