http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1694
steven.leung@xxxxxxxxxxxx changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
------- Comment #7 from steven.leung@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-12-14 04:02 GMT -------
I tried to verify it to find it NOT resolved.
I'm going to attach a sample CAP to illustrate this point. Packets #2955,
#2956 and #2959 are the same frames and #2959 is the only one actually
acknowledged. The TCP decode shouldn't say that #2956 and #2959 are duplicate
TCP ACKs. It should ignore #2955 and #2956 and only decode #2959 as if it is
the only frame available among the 3.
Build info:
Version 0.99.8-SVN-23856 (SVN Rev 23856)
Copyright 1998-2007 Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> and contributors.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled with GTK+ 2.12.3, with GLib 2.14.4, with WinPcap (version unknown),
with libz 1.2.3, with libpcre 6.4, with SMI 0.4.5, with ADNS, with Lua 5.1,
with
GnuTLS 1.6.1, with Gcrypt 1.2.3, with MIT Kerberos, with PortAudio PortAudio
V19-devel, with AirPcap.
Running on Windows XP Service Pack 2, build 2600, without WinPcap, without
AirPcap.
Built using Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 build 8804
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.