Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1787] packet-bfd.c display filter field problems

Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:12:08 +0000 (GMT)
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1787





------- Comment #5 from christopher.maynard@xxxxxxxxx  2007-11-27 21:12 GMT -------
One curious thing I noticed though.  With the display filter field abbreviation
change of bfdcontrol to bfd, we now have a few duplicate display filter field
names.  For example, there are now two:

bfd.flags.p
bfd.flags.f

Should the two previous bfdcontrol.flags.p and bfdcontrol.flags.f be renamed to
bfd.control.flags.p and bfd.control.flags.f to avoid the conflict?  Perhaps
some of the others should be renamed to bfd.control.x as well?  I don't know
anything about this protocol to make any decision as to how best to resolve
this, merely reporting it. ;)


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.