http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1852
Summary: packet-g*.c display filter field problems.
Product: Wireshark
Version: SVN
Platform: PC
URL: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-
dev/200708/msg00442.html
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: Minor
Priority: Low
Component: Wireshark
AssignedTo: wireshark-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
ReportedBy: christopher.maynard@xxxxxxxxx
Build Information:
SVN 22883
--
These packet-g*.c files all have display filter issues:
1) packet-gryphon.c: PROTOABBREV is "gryphon", but display filter fields are
prefixed with only "gryph".
2) packet-gmrp.c: PROTOABBREV is "gmrp", but display filter fields are prefixed
with "garp".
3) packet-gssapi.c: PROTOABBREV is "gss-api", but display filter fields are
prefixed with "gssapi".
4) packet-gvrp.c: PROTOABBREV is "gvrp", but display filter fields are prefixed
with "garp", most of which conflict with packet-gmrp.c's display filter fields.
5) packet-gsm_a.c: gsm_a_bssmap has 121 registered fields. Only a limited few
are prefixed to match the PROTOABBREV. Some of the fields seem as though they
would be more appropriately registered under either gsm_a_dtap or possibly
gsm_a_rp. I don't have the expertise with these dissectors to provide an
appropriate patch to reconcile these problems.
6) packet-gsm_map.c: There are 1174 display filter fields registered. Most are
prefixed appropriately as "gsm_map", but many others are prefixed as "gsm_old",
or even "gad", "gsm_ss", or with no prefix at all. I don't know if the ones
with "gsm_old" are simply obsolete display filter fields or if they should be
prefixed as "gsm_map.old." or what. Similar uncertainties for the others.
Someone more knowledgeable than I am with respect to this dissector should
provide a patch for it.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.