http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1606
------- Comment #4 from richardv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-08-21 20:43 GMT -------
Hrm. I don't find the memory management of this particularly easy to follow,
I'm afraid.
Why does proto_register_netflow() need to copy the global_*_ports ranges?
afaict they are always freed before they are used.
Would it be possible to:
* add a comment next to the declarations of netflow_ports and ipfix_ports
stating what they do
* extract the common parts of proto_reg_handoff_netflow and netflow_reinit to
a common function?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.