http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1691
------- Comment #9 from sake@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-07-24 16:56 GMT -------
> Filter: !(frame.time_delta < 10)
>
> Basically picks packets 10seconds apart and displays them, and not the frames
> that arrived 10seconds after a frame (that might not be in the view)
That is the behaviour prior to version 0.99.6, are you sure you are running
Wireshark 0.99.6?
> Maybe one suggestion is to add a frame.time_delta_captured ?
The current (as in version 0.99.6 and later) meaning of frame.time_delta is
actually frame.time_delta_captured
> or
>
> I can see that it would be nice to filter, and then maybe re-compute delta's
> based on the displayed info, and then filter again.
With the current two fields frame.time_delta and frame.time_delta_displayed,
you can manage that yourselves by filtering on the right fields and showing the
ones you're interested in.
Cheers,
Sake
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.