http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1502
------- Comment #11 from nagendra0123@xxxxxxxxx 2007-07-07 05:56 GMT -------
Hi Jorg
Thanks for your reply & your suggestions which you given me in last mail.
But I am not blind user or new user to wireshark, I am using this tool from
almost 2 years, I havent faced any problem as that time I was using SNMPV2 but
newly I moved to SNMPV3 application developement for which I need support from
wireshark.
As & when I received fixes from wireshark developers I used same. Even this
problem I am seeing with
http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/win32/wireshark-setup-0.99.7-SVN-22242.exe
If you see bug no. 1674 that gives complete info about wireshark version.
But really its blocking me, so expecting something from wireshark.
As my company terms & conditions are not allowing me to send capture files so I
am failing to send same.
thanks
Nagendra
In reply to comment #10)
> Now I am getting a bit irritated with the way you report the bug and handle
> the reporting:
> This bug is not a blocker, please click on the word severity to find out what
> the values mean. By changing the values back to blocker, you also completely
> ignored one of the developers (comment #7, second paragraph) without knowing
> what you were doing. It also obviously isn't of high priority, even to
> you: You were asked on April 1st (comment #5) to try a newer version, and you
> report back more than 3 months later (comment #6) and you haven't even tested a
> version new enough to contain the fix which is mentioned there.
> If you really think that this bug is of high priority, then please prove so by
> creating a trace that you can attach to this bug and provide the password so we
> can reproduce this.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.