[bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1503


sake@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #600 is|0                           |1
           obsolete|                            |




------- Comment #6 from sake@xxxxxxxxxx  2007-04-03 19:26 GMT -------
Created an attachment (id=604)
 --> (http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=604&action=view)
fix-bug1503-2.patch

Hi Richard,

You are right, wireshark SHOULD be able to filter on multiple hf's with the
same field-name, BUT there is a little bug in the code. I have pinpointed it to
the following in epan/dfilter/dfvm.c:

case CHECK_EXISTS:
  hfinfo = arg1->value.hfinfo;
  while(hfinfo) {
    accum = proto_check_for_protocol_or_field(tree, 
      arg1->value.hfinfo->id);
    if (accum) {
      break;
    } else {
      hfinfo = hfinfo->same_name_next;
    }
  }
  break;

It actually loops through all the hf's with the same name, but only checks
against the original (first) hf.

So, I fixed this and reverted my patch to only include the other issues,
leaving the multiple hf's with the same field-name intact.

Could you review this updated patch?

Cheers,


Sake


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.