http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1430
------- Comment #5 from jeff.morriss@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-03-10 07:13 GMT -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> 3. Would some blurb + the ethercat.org homepage do?
Yes, I think so. Just so someone reading the source can have some clue what
it's for.
> About packet-beckhoff dissector: No opinion on this, Richard Kuemmel is
> probably the right person to ask?
Doesn't matter for now, I just had the thought.
> Wiki: How large should the sample be?
Well, just a few interesting packets would be good, I guess. I'd find it
useful to see the output a bit before checking it and also to fuzz test the
dissector (just to make sure it won't crash with bad input).
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.