http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=964
------- Comment #15 from jeff.morriss@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-19 02:27 GMT -------
(In reply to comment #14)
> Don't quite agree... there are a lot of us still using Ethereal/Wireshark on
> old boxes running old OS's. Now I know that Windows 98SE is not the sexiest OS
> there is these days, but I think it would be worth a look over to see if it can
> be fixed without too much blood, sweat and tears. I agree that no-one is going
> to burn lots of resources on it, but closing it without looking at it seems a
> bit like a cop-out ;-) I have every faith in you guys.
>
> Just my two eurocents worth!
Sorry, I am just repeating what I've read in the mailing list and Wiki,
particularly this thread:
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200608/msg00692.html
>From that message:
~~~
- GTK2.8 (and higher) definitely won't even work with 9x
- WinPcap no longer actively supports Win9x (so it may or may not work)
- Microsoft don't support 9x any longer
~~~
Plus it seems no Wireshark developer even has access to a Win98 system so they
can't even _try_ to support it, even if they wanted to and even if the
tools/libraries Wireshark needs supported Win98.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.