http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
------- Comment #4 from gentoo-a7x@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-27 08:55 GMT -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> It looks like free(0) isn't valid with their setup.
>
> From the code it doesn't seems to be a faulty call to free.
I'm not 100% convinced that it's not a faulty call... If calling except_free
with a null pointer is normal, then why don't non-SSP builds crash?
Could it be that glibc's free(NULL) is normally a no-op but somehow causes a
crash if called from a program that's been compiled with SSP? If so, is this
by design or is there a bug in SSP or glibc?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.